Black-Box, White-Box, and Gray-Box Testing Explained

May 4, 2023
Canary Trap

In the world of cybersecurity, one of the most important techniques for assessing the security of a system is penetration testing. Penetration testing, or pen testing for short, is the process of simulating a real-world attack on a system in order to identify vulnerabilities that could be exploited by an attacker.

There are three main approaches when it comes to pen testing: black-box, white-box, and gray-box. Each approach has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice of which approach to use depends on the specific goals and context of the pen test.

Black-Box Penetration Testing

Black-box penetration testing is the most commonly used approach when it comes to pen testing. In a black-box test, the tester has no prior knowledge of the system being tested. Testers are only given the name or IP address of the system and they must try to gain access to it using any means necessary.

This type of testing is intended to simulate an attack by an external hacker who has no insider knowledge of the system. As was noted in an article by RedScan, “The pen tester in this instance follows the approach of an unprivileged attacker, from initial access and execution through to exploitation”, which can be considered one of the most authentic scenarios in a real life cyber attack.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Black-Box Penetration Testing

The main advantage of black-box penetration testing is that it provides a realistic assessment of the system’s security posture from the perspective of an external attacker. It also forces the tester to use their creativity and ingenuity to find vulnerabilities, just as a real attacker would.

On the other hand, black-box testing also has some disadvantages. It can be time-consuming and can be more expensive, as the tester must spend a lot of time and resources trying to gain access to the system. Additionally, black-box testing may not uncover vulnerabilities that could only be identified by someone with insider knowledge of the system.

When to Use Black-Box Penetration Testing

Black-box penetration testing is ideal when the goal is to assess the security of a system from the perspective of an external attacker. Since black-box testing relies on dynamic analysis of running programs and systems within a network, “the duration of the assignment largely depends on the tester’s ability to locate and exploit vulnerabilities in the target’s outward-facing services”, according to cybersecurity researchers at InfoSec Institute.

White-Box Penetration Testing

White-box penetration testing is the opposite of black-box testing. In a white-box test, the tester has full knowledge of the system being tested. This includes access to source code, network diagrams, and other sensitive information that would not be available to an external attacker.

An article published in Spiceworks details how “white box testing is leveraged to improve design, usability, and application security. This methodology is designed to conduct in-depth simulations of all the scenarios the application might encounter at the code level.”

Advantages and Disadvantages of White-Box Penetration Testing

The main advantage of white-box penetration testing is that it allows the tester to identify vulnerabilities that would be difficult or impossible to find in a black-box test. For example, if the system being tested is a web application, the tester could examine the source code to identify vulnerabilities in the application’s logic.

However, white-box testing also has some disadvantages. Because the tester has full knowledge of the system, the test may not accurately simulate a real-world attack. In fact, a white-box approach is intended to simulate attacks by insiders who have full knowledge of the system.

Additionally, white-box testing may be more time-consuming and expensive compared to black-box testing, as the tester must spend a lot of time analyzing the system’s architecture and source code.

When to Use White-Box Penetration Testing

White-box testing is ideal when the goal is to identify vulnerabilities that would be difficult or impossible to find in a black-box test. To accomplish this, the tester is provided with full knowledge of the systems and aims to identify vulnerabilities that could be exploited by an insider who also has full access.

As mentioned in the Spicework article: “White box testing is generally arranged solely for the most critical components of an application. This is due to the resource-intensive nature of white box procedures. It is deployed for applications […] that have the potential to affect living conditions directly, and, thus, cannot afford to fail.”

Gray-Box Penetration Testing

Gray-box penetration testing is a combination of black-box and white-box testing. In a gray-box test, the tester has only some knowledge of the system being tested. For example, the tester may have access to the system’s user interface, but not its source code or network diagrams.

Researchers at InfoSec mentioned in an article that the purpose of gray-box testing “is to provide a more focused and efficient assessment of a network’s security than a black-box assessment. Using the design documentation for a network, pentesters can focus their assessment efforts on the systems with the greatest risk and value from the start, rather than spending time determining this information on their own.”

Advantages and Disadvantages of Gray-Box Penetration Testing

The main advantage of gray-box penetration testing is that it allows the tester to identify vulnerabilities that would be difficult or impossible to find in a black-box test, while still providing some level of realism and simulating a real-world attack. Additionally, gray-box testing is often less time-consuming and expensive than white-box testing, as the tester does not need to spend as much time analyzing the system’s architecture and source code.

However, gray-box testing also has some disadvantages. Because the tester has some knowledge of the system, the test may not accurately simulate a real-world attack, or may not uncover vulnerabilities that could only be identified by someone with full knowledge of the system.

When to Use Gray-Box Penetration Testing

Gray-box testing is ideal when the goal is to identify vulnerabilities that would be difficult or impossible to find in a black-box test, while still providing some level of realism in a simulated attack. This approach to testing is best used when the tester has some knowledge of the system and wants to detect and correct vulnerabilities by external attackers.

As stated in a 2022 article by PacketLab, “starting with some background information and low-level credentials helps testers adopt a more efficient and streamlined approach. This saves time on the reconnaissance phase, allowing the consultants to focus their efforts on exploiting potential vulnerabilities in higher-risk systems rather than attempting to discover where these systems may be found.”

Choosing the Right Approach to Penetration Testing

In order to determine the right approach to penetration testing, it is important to consider the specific goals and context of the test.

The table below summarizes the main advantages and disadvantages of each approach to pen testing, as well as when they are best used.

Pen Testing Approach	Advantages	Disadvantages	When to Use
Black-box	– Realistic assessment from an external attacker’s perspective – Forces creativity and ingenuity	– Time-consuming and can be more expensive – May not uncover vulnerabilities that could only be identified by someone with insider knowledge	When assessing the security of a system from the perspective of an external attacker
White-box	– Identifies vulnerabilities that would be difficult or impossible to find in a black-box test	– May not accurately simulate a real-world attack – More time-consuming and can be more expensive than black-box testing	When identifying vulnerabilities that could be exploited by an insider with full knowledge of the system
Grey-box	– Identifies vulnerabilities that would be difficult or impossible to find in a black-box test – Less time-consuming and expensive than white-box testing	– May not accurately simulate a real-world attack – May not uncover vulnerabilities that could only be identified by someone with full knowledge of the system	When identifying vulnerabilities that could be exploited by an attacker with limited insider knowledge

Pen Testing Approach

Advantages

Disadvantages

When to Use

Black-box

– Realistic assessment from an external attacker’s perspective

– Forces creativity and ingenuity

– Time-consuming and can be more expensive

– May not uncover vulnerabilities that could only be identified by someone with insider knowledge

When assessing the security of a system from the perspective of an external attacker

White-box

– Identifies vulnerabilities that would be difficult or impossible to find in a black-box test

– May not accurately simulate a real-world attack

– More time-consuming and can be more expensive than black-box testing

When identifying vulnerabilities that could be exploited by an insider with full knowledge of the system

Grey-box

– Identifies vulnerabilities that would be difficult or impossible to find in a black-box test

– Less time-consuming and expensive than white-box testing

– May not accurately simulate a real-world attack

– May not uncover vulnerabilities that could only be identified by someone with full knowledge of the system

When identifying vulnerabilities that could be exploited by an attacker with limited insider knowledge

In Conclusion

Penetration testing is a critical technique for assessing the security of a system. The choice of which type of pen testing approach to use depends on the specific goals and context of the test.

Black-box testing is ideal when assessing the security of a system from the perspective of an external attacker. White-box testing is ideal when identifying vulnerabilities that would be difficult or impossible to find in a black-box test, and gray-box testing is ideal when identifying vulnerabilities that could be exploited by an attacker with limited insider knowledge.

By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each approach to pen testing, security professionals can make informed decisions about which type is best to use to ensure that their systems are as secure as possible.

SOURCES:

Black-Box, White-Box, and Gray-Box Testing Explained